What would a faster-than-light spacecraft look like if spacetime were not a physical fabric, dark matter were exhausted ancient light, and inertia emerged from the relational pull of the cosmos?…
Read signal →
A companion ArcSecs essay arguing that if distant galaxies can separate faster than light under standard cosmology, then “nothing can exceed c” is not a universal architectural law. It is…
Read signal →
An ArcSecs systems-architecture argument against treating spacetime as a literal physical fabric. Using test-driven development logic, the article reframes gravitational lensing, photon mass, absolute time, massive electrodynamics, tired light, and…
Read signal →
A practical ArcSecs guide to the observational fingerprints of slow-light cosmology: redshift drift, lensing anomalies, time-delay stretching, brightness-distance errors, photon-mass constraints, and the precision instruments needed to separate speculation from…
Read signal →
A deep, WordPress-ready exploration of slow light, quantum interferometry, dark refraction, sub-luminal quanta, condensed-relic dark matter, and the space-based metrology stack needed to test dark-sector theories.
Read signal →
A deep dive into why modern physics increasingly treats spacetime not as a cosmic substance or container, but as an emergent, relational, holographic, or even eliminable structure arising from quantum…
Read signal →
As the universe expands, distant light becomes stretched, weakened, delayed, and eventually lost from visibility. ArcSecs asks whether that lost light is truly gone — or whether it remains part…
Read signal →
What if dark matter is not a new invisible particle, but ordinary light that has fallen out of visibility? Slow-Light Dark Matter Theory proposes that redshifted, delayed, horizon-locked, or phase-hidden…
Read signal →
What if spacetime was never a physical thing, but only a useful mathematical shortcut? This ArcSecs article explores infinite space, universal time, gravity acting on light, and tired light as…
Read signal →
A speculative ArcSecs essay asking whether the masslessness of photons should be treated as a settled truth or a powerful assumption that deserves sharper testing.
Read signal →